From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <frysk-bugzilla-return-2236-listarch-frysk-bugzilla=sourceware.org@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 23805 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2007 09:07:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 21847 invoked by uid 48); 10 Jul 2007 09:07:13 -0000
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:07:00 -0000
From: "mark at klomp dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Message-ID: <20070710090713.4760.mark@klomp.org>
Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug general/4760] New: ByteBuffer and subclasses should have efficient bulk put() methods
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Mailing-List: contact frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: frysk-bugzilla-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2
List-Id: <frysk-bugzilla.sourceware.org>

ByteBuffer provide a bulk get() method to read in a whole byte[] at once. An
equivalent bulk put() method and efficient implementations of it for the
ByteBuffer subclasses used in frysk would be beneficial for performance.

-- 
           Summary: ByteBuffer and subclasses should have efficient bulk
                    put() methods
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4760

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.