From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21276 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2008 16:36:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 21098 invoked by uid 48); 11 Feb 2008 16:36:14 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080211163614.21097.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pmachata at redhat dot com" To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20080130141626.5695.cagney@redhat.com> References: <20080130141626.5695.cagney@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug general/5695] review ftrace options X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-bugzilla-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00313.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat dot com 2008-02-11 16:36 ------- Per our IRC discussion, I implemented the following: * ftrace supports -stack option, which enforces stack tracing on each hit (be it syscall or function call). * ftrace doesn't recognize -S and -t anymore. Instead, it understands -sys option, with the meaning similar to -plt and friends. System calls are not traced by default anymore. * Manual page has been updated accordingly. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5695 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.