From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <frysk-bugzilla-return-3864-listarch-frysk-bugzilla=sourceware.org@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8898 invoked by alias); 21 May 2008 13:16:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 8645 invoked by uid 48); 21 May 2008 13:15:21 -0000
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 13:16:00 -0000
From: "cagney at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Message-ID: <20080521131521.6543.cagney@redhat.com>
Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug general/6543] New: <<break N>> shall break at line N; <<brea foo>> breaks at foo's location
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Mailing-List: contact frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: frysk-bugzilla-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-q2/txt/msg00167.txt.bz2
List-Id: <frysk-bugzilla.sourceware.org>

The spec is clear about this one; for instance:
  break 10
breaks at _line_ 10.  This means that simple values such as:
  break 10+1
(which don't have a location can probably also be interpreted the same way)

conversely, a specifiication such as:
  break foo
where foo yields a location implies breaking at that location.

-- 
           Summary: <<break N>> shall break at line N; <<brea foo>> breaks
                    at foo's location
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246,6540
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6543

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.