From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20038 invoked by alias); 27 May 2008 16:16:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 19861 invoked by uid 48); 27 May 2008 16:16:18 -0000 Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 16:16:00 -0000 From: "cagney at redhat dot com" To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org Message-ID: <20080527161618.6570.cagney@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug general/6570] New: Report lack of a disassembler at run time as UNRESOLVED / UNSUPPORTED X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-bugzilla-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q2/txt/msg00190.txt.bz2 List-Id: The old lib.opcodes bindings had a way to detect, at runtime, that there wasn't a disassembler. The testsuite used that to skip (mark as unsupported) disassembler tests. The new bindings lack this (they throw an exception which could be caught?). This will let us correctly fix tests such as: public class TestDisassemblerCommand extends TestLib { public void testHpdDisassemble() { if (unsupported("disassembler", true)) return; to instead be: public void testHpdDisassemble() { if (missingDisassembler()) return; Where frysk.junit.TestCase.missingDisassembler(), modeled on missing32and64(), would report UNRESOLVED on IA-32 and x86-64 where there should be a disassembler, but UNSUPPORTED on PPC where the disassembler is simply missing. -- Summary: Report lack of a disassembler at run time as UNRESOLVED / UNSUPPORTED Product: frysk Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: general AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com OtherBugsDependingO 6541 nThis: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6570 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.