From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29525 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2007 19:14:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 29517 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Feb 2007 19:14:41 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wildebeest.demon.nl (HELO gnu.wildebeest.org) (83.160.170.119) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:14:35 +0000 Received: from dijkstra.wildebeest.org ([192.168.1.29]) by gnu.wildebeest.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJaSO-0002FN-Fl for frysk@sourceware.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:15:20 +0100 Subject: Re: user discussion & meeting and more meetings From: Mark Wielaard To: frysk In-Reply-To: <45D34165.7090300@redhat.com> References: <45D34165.7090300@redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KWVzQpwjvmtyidwcQ0Ad" Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:14:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1171998871.3587.56.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-1.fc6) X-Spam-Score: -5.8 (-----) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on sourceware.org X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00143.txt.bz2 --=-KWVzQpwjvmtyidwcQ0Ad Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1185 On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 12:05 -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > lets throw this open for debate; > > There are several ideas to kick around: > -> expand Wednesday morning's meeting to include other matters > -> add a second weekly meeting > -> Cycle the Wednesday meeting so that it alternates between user /=20 > technical / co-op focused > -> have less regular technical/co-op focused meetings > -> use mailing lists and irc for technical stuff > -> ... I like to see stuff pushed to the mailinglist as much as possible since that means there is an automatic record and you can read/respond on your own time. The ui meetings are useful to explicitly focus on actual usage. But it looks like doing that once a week is too much for all the feedback it generates. It seems to take more than a week to actually change the code based on all the feedback. So doing the ui reviews bi-weekly seems better. If we do want to have a phone meeting to sync technical, who-works-on-what status reports than it seems a good idea to alternate those on a weekly basis with a ui-review meeting to keep the meetings short and focused. I kind of tune out after 30/60 minutes on the phone... Cheers, Mark --=-KWVzQpwjvmtyidwcQ0Ad Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-length: 189 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBF20iWxVhZCJWr9QwRAtK3AKCeUA66pUzwnY4TcFY3daMYUJXn8QCfSJN/ Eb5CxaX9nVx1+2Dl0cOeG7k= =NM5X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KWVzQpwjvmtyidwcQ0Ad--