From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9011 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2007 19:10:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 8998 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2007 19:10:04 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wildebeest.demon.nl (HELO gnu.wildebeest.org) (83.160.170.119) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:09:57 +0000 Received: from dijkstra.wildebeest.org ([192.168.1.29]) by gnu.wildebeest.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HSeJE-000666-Eh; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:11:20 +0100 Subject: Re: Automated build and test system (overview) From: Mark Wielaard To: Kris Van Hees Cc: frysk@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20070312174441.GA15831@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> References: <20070309171529.GB6691@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <1173702209.4335.21.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> <20070312174441.GA15831@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-J82/RcuTVXEVJYXAAhOF" Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:10:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1174158593.9582.30.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-1.fc6) X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on sourceware.org X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00226.txt.bz2 --=-J82/RcuTVXEVJYXAAhOF Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 932 Hi Kris, On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 10:44 -0700, Kris Van Hees wrote: > > Do you have any plans on having more "intelligent" parsing of the result > > files? Just having the result files published for various architectures > > over time will be of great help. Having something that can pinpoint when > > which test result flipped from PASS/FAIL would be great. >=20 > I definitely hope to be able to make the reporting more than just > pass/fail kind of information for the various stages. If we can add requests, is there a simple way for you to set things up so that test reports are made/compared between a system with selinux enabled and disabled? I recently saw an somewhat obscure bug in gdb being reported that depended on a selinux denial happening/not-happening (and not properly checking a result code). So I thought it would be good to see differences between test results for frysk also with it en/disabled. Cheers, Mark --=-J82/RcuTVXEVJYXAAhOF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-length: 189 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBF/Dz8xVhZCJWr9QwRArQDAJ0bn7nfHnX1WuwB0cL9RyVdNgtPLwCeLnKo 1f9iBheyH0Ft6Rq4DHiofrw= =HbGl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-J82/RcuTVXEVJYXAAhOF--