From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19574 invoked by alias); 30 May 2007 12:07:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 19566 invoked by uid 22791); 30 May 2007 12:07:43 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wildebeest.demon.nl (HELO gnu.wildebeest.org) (83.160.170.119) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 May 2007 12:07:41 +0000 Received: from dijkstra.wildebeest.org ([192.168.1.29]) by gnu.wildebeest.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtMzg-0006Ee-FL; Wed, 30 May 2007 14:09:36 +0200 Subject: Re: Automated build-and-test summary report (2007/05/23) From: Mark Wielaard To: Kris Van Hees Cc: Andrew Cagney , frysk@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20070530011241.GB14523@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> References: <20070523141034.GA16276@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <46545CB3.6000509@redhat.com> <20070523214658.GB16276@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <4655CCF6.8080607@redhat.com> <20070524192441.GC16276@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <465B262C.5090104@redhat.com> <465C6197.6030405@redhat.com> <20070530011241.GB14523@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-T5Dg+BKwUlzhPlmsGqy2" Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 12:53:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1180526845.4441.17.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-2.fc6) X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on sourceware.org X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 --=-T5Dg+BKwUlzhPlmsGqy2 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 723 On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 18:12 -0700, Kris Van Hees wrote: > So, please enlighten me: what is the *real* problem here? I like the test results and do always quickly look at them to see if they correspond to what I am seeing locally. But I can see how it might be annoying for them to appear on the main list. Lets create a frysk-testresults@sourceware.org and encourage everybody to publish their frysk test run results there. That way we have an easy way for people to filter out the test runs from the main discussion list and still keep an archive to consult for any historical issues which is really valuable when some failure doesn't occur for someone locally, but is visible on one of the test machines. Cheers, Mark --=-T5Dg+BKwUlzhPlmsGqy2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-length: 189 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGXWj4xVhZCJWr9QwRAuXWAJ48HlPm0fHfh6sKvS8hCjA2h2A//gCgi+Kz FPaswQT/7fVdOp4wiNMrwy0= =LRub -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-T5Dg+BKwUlzhPlmsGqy2--