From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26156 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2007 14:38:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 26149 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2007 14:38:51 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wildebeest.demon.nl (HELO gnu.wildebeest.org) (83.160.170.119) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:38:47 +0000 Received: from dijkstra.wildebeest.org ([192.168.1.29]) by gnu.wildebeest.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8dNN-0005YE-1D; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:41:09 +0200 Subject: Re: frysk-top ChangeLog From: Mark Wielaard To: Kris Van Hees Cc: Andrew Cagney , frysk@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20070711134714.GC11657@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> References: <20070710160014.27101.qmail@sourceware.org> <1184147639.4322.25.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> <4694DC53.4040903@redhat.com> <20070711134714.GC11657@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-AX57hq77AIacFk0K74bi" Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:38:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1184164716.4322.36.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-2.fc6) X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on sourceware.org X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2 --=-AX57hq77AIacFk0K74bi Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 675 Hi, On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 06:47 -0700, Kris Van Hees wrote: > This brings up the question: why don't htdocs have changelog entries? I > can't see a good reason against having them, and there are benefits to > having changelog entries for this stuff, either way. >=20 > Obviously, Mark did feel that there was a good reason to have a > changelog entry for the patch he commited. To be honest I was just following what others do. As far as I know htdocs changes are documented in the ChangeLog file since that is how I found out where to document them. I also don't see much reason not to have them. I was just surprised mine got deleted without any comment. Cheers, Mark --=-AX57hq77AIacFk0K74bi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-length: 189 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGlOtnxVhZCJWr9QwRAmlsAKChYTAqo6SAstrNZb4+zeLaS3NyxACggJbT JdjEaZjGWnGzSTPVkrLNusk= =ABGf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-AX57hq77AIacFk0K74bi--