From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32332 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2007 10:15:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 32321 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Nov 2007 10:15:13 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,TW_FH X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wildebeest.demon.nl (HELO gnu.wildebeest.org) (83.160.170.119) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:15:11 +0000 Received: from dijkstra.wildebeest.org ([192.168.1.29]) by gnu.wildebeest.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IsyE8-0001bo-1k; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:15:08 +0100 Subject: Re: fhpd vs RuntimeExceptions From: Mark Wielaard To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Phil Muldoon , frysk@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <473C93A5.6080609@redhat.com> References: <1195050364.3027.24.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> <473C7B74.6090109@redhat.com> <1195148516.3010.27.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> <473C93A5.6080609@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:15:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1195208107.3001.10.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 (2.12.1-3.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q4/txt/msg00149.txt.bz2 Hi Andrew, On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 13:44 -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Er, no. We're not going to make all commands gobble all exceptions > locally. I didn't mean locally at the lowest command level. I meant at the appropriate level in the core. Commands should never have to decide locally if an exception is fatal or not. And they shouldn't need to gobble up exceptions of course because they might contain important information about what happened. Cheers, Mark