From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14423 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2007 17:12:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 14416 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2007 17:12:53 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_PBL,SARE_RMML_Stock10 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from cpc1-cmbg8-0-0-cust558.cmbg.cable.ntl.com (HELO zebedee.littlepinkcloud.COM) (82.6.106.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:12:51 +0000 Received: from littlepinkcloud.COM (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zebedee.littlepinkcloud.COM (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l6BHCgwB018716; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:12:43 +0100 Received: (from aph@localhost) by littlepinkcloud.COM (8.13.8/8.13.5/Submit) id l6BHCg2j018713; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:12:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18069.3978.11236.967269@zebedee.pink> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:12:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley To: Andrew Cagney Cc: frysk@sourceware.org, java-project@redhat.com Subject: Re: cni vs jni In-Reply-To: <4694F12E.6080406@redhat.com> References: <4694F12E.6080406@redhat.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.93.1 Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00091.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > [This was today's technical topic] > Possible options > > - simplistically translate the bindings into JNI > > - push more core code into C++ and move the bindings to a higher layer > > - status quo Or port CNI to Sun's Java. It's far from impossible, and as far as I an see the only real obstacle is getting buy-in from the GNU C++ maintainers. Andrew. -- Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903