From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15504 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2008 18:03:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 15451 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Mar 2008 18:03:18 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:02:57 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m25I2uqA020020 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:02:56 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m25I2thG009961 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:02:55 -0500 Received: from mopsy.redhat.com (vpn-248-60.boston.redhat.com [10.13.248.60]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m25I2p9B013135; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:02:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18382.54075.736457.76675@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:03:00 -0000 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Tom Tromey , frysk@sourceware.org Subject: Re: patch to add breakpoint commands In-Reply-To: <47CEDB6F.2090301@redhat.com> References: <18382.49031.893322.680963@fleche.redhat.com> <47CEDB6F.2090301@redhat.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.x-xemacs-522 under Emacs 22.1.1 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu) From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-Attribution: Tom X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00132.txt.bz2 Andrew> for all of these they have several things: [...] Andrew> - should the end result be to stop or continue (attribute or not?) For this I don't see much wrong with the gdb model -- stop by default, let the command specify "go" if it wants. This has never caused me much trouble (while OTOH I frequently forget 'silent'). Andrew> that can be characterised as attributes; as, dare I suggest, Andrew> you're reading into the intent of the HPD, the way to do this Andrew> is would be with -silent option to the commands that create Andrew> and edit (see actions) actionpoints. Yeah, that would be fine by me. Tom