From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26327 invoked by alias); 7 May 2007 15:21:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 26320 invoked by uid 22791); 7 May 2007 15:21:35 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com (HELO rgminet01.oracle.com) (148.87.113.118) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 May 2007 15:21:29 +0000 Received: from rgmsgw02.us.oracle.com (rgmsgw02.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.52]) by rgminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id l47FLGcv013468; Mon, 7 May 2007 09:21:16 -0600 Received: from ca-server1.us.oracle.com (ca-server1.us.oracle.com [139.185.48.5]) by rgmsgw02.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.2.4) with ESMTP id l47FLFVO016855 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 May 2007 09:21:15 -0600 Received: from kvanhees by ca-server1.us.oracle.com with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hl51W-0000CA-UW; Mon, 07 May 2007 08:21:14 -0700 Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 16:08:00 -0000 From: Kris Van Hees To: Andrew Cagney Cc: frysk Subject: Re: stack call Message-ID: <20070507152114.GB20444@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> References: <463F331C.8050302@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <463F331C.8050302@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00125.txt.bz2 A few questions... 1. Is this an open call? I am willing to bet that I am not the only one who is also interested in this topic and would be quite interested in technical topics discussion like this (and hopefully able to contribute to it). If not an open call, err, why not? :) 2. If it is an open call, it might be a good idea to post basic call-in information, even if things like passcode are best left out of emails to public mailing lists. Can always put in a reference on who to ask for the passcode. 3. Can calls like this perhaps be announced a bit more in advance so people may be able to make arrangements to join the call? Cheers, Kris On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:09:32AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Phil, Nurdin, Sami, Stan, > > I'd like to set up a quick call this morning to discuss next steps for > stack-back-tracing. In particular using .debug_info to create a more > detailed back-trace. > > I'll reserve 11 Toronto time. > > Andrew >