Re: frysk-top ChangeLog

[Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@oracle.com>]

This brings up the question: why don't htdocs have changelog entries?  I
can't see a good reason against having them, and there are benefits to
having changelog entries for this stuff, either way.

I also have to second Mark's opinion that simply removing his entry
rather than talking about it seems a bit harsh.  Obviously, Mark did
feel that there was a good reason to have a changelog entry for the
patch he commited.  That alone should be enough reason to make this a
matter to discuss.

	Cheers,
	Kris

On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 09:34:11AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> htdocs do not have changelogs entries; they never have.
> 
> Something more interesting is why htdocs do not get posted to frysk-cvs; 
> I'm investigating.
> 
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >Hi Andrew,
> >
> >On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:00 +0000, cagney@sourceware.org wrote:
> >  
> >>Log message:
> >>	Remove stray changelog entry.x
> >>
> >>Patches:
> >>http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/frysk-top/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=frysk&r1=1.87&r2=1.88
> >>    
> >
> >Why did you remove my ChangeLog entry? I explicitly put that there to
> >document the change and because other ChangeLog entries for htdocs
> >related files also went into that file. If you feel they are better
> >documented in some other ChangeLog file please just tell me instead of
> >silently removing patches so I know why/where I should document these
> >things.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Mark
> >  
>