From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24598 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2007 23:31:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 24591 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Aug 2007 23:31:38 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from agminet01.oracle.com (HELO agminet01.oracle.com) (141.146.126.228) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:31:31 +0000 Received: from agmgw1.us.oracle.com (agmgw1.us.oracle.com [152.68.180.212]) by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id l7UNVFxS015496; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:31:15 -0500 Received: from acsmt350.oracle.com (acsmt350.oracle.com [141.146.40.150]) by agmgw1.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.0/Switch-3.2.0) with ESMTP id l7TCPLiV016835; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:31:14 -0600 Received: from alchar.org by acsmt352.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3173392921188516611; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:30:11 -0700 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:31:00 -0000 From: Kris Van Hees To: Chris Moller Cc: Kris Van Hees , frysk@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Chris' utracer Message-ID: <20070830233009.GH22263@oracle.com> References: <20070830201919.GF22263@oracle.com> <46D74F42.6060303@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46D74F42.6060303@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00375.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 07:14:10PM -0400, Chris Moller wrote: > Kris Van Hees wrote: > > After doing a checkout of the frysk-utrace module to haved a look at it, I > > notived that it does not have any form of license or copyright statement > > listed. The only hint at a license is in the kernel module license > > specification. > > > > Is that intentional, or oversight? > > It's an oversight, but it's still very much alpha-level code and not > intended for general distribution. Thanks for clearing that up. I definitely wasn't thinking about any form of distribution or other use beyond frysk. It just seemed odd to not have any copyright or license information on the files, hence the question. Having it in there will avoid any confusion about the code's status in a public repository. Cheers, Kris