From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30749 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2007 19:41:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 30728 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Feb 2007 19:41:55 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:41:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1EJfgf4026429 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:41:42 -0500 Received: from pobox.hsv.redhat.com (pobox.hsv.redhat.com [172.16.16.12]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1EJffFk031405 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:41:42 -0500 Received: from [10.11.14.11] (vpn-14-11.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.11]) by pobox.hsv.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l1EJfeVL005727 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:41:41 -0500 Message-ID: <45D365F4.7010608@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:41:00 -0000 From: Rick Moseley User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070102) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: frysk Subject: Re: user discussion & meeting and more meetings References: <45D34165.7090300@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <45D34165.7090300@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00128.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > lets throw this open for debate; > > On Wednesday's @9:30 CA-EST is a discussion about UI aspects of > frysk. The discussion ranges from utilities through to the gnome > components. The discussion has the following goals: > -> focus on end user experience > -> be focused - very limited topic list, shorter meeting > -> have clear outcomes, and follow them through > -> occasionally, the opportunity to explore new ideas > At the moment I'm picking things driven largely by active work that > I'm aware of. Going forward, I hope this will evolve into more of a > weekly show-n-tell - an opportunity to highlight progress and gain > quick feedback on new work. The discussion is proving to be largely > non-technical. > > Elena is asking that there also be made available time where non user > issues can be addressed: > -> a free technical exchange > -> co-operative planning and administration > (At present there's an internal meeting that touches on this). > > There are several ideas to kick around: > -> expand Wednesday morning's meeting to include other matters > -> add a second weekly meeting > -> Cycle the Wednesday meeting so that it alternates between user / > technical / co-op focused I vote for this. Having weekly UI stuff does not allow time to necessarily implement changes. Maybe it was good here at the first because the UI had not been reviewed in a while, but now that it has moving to a less-than-weekly review would be best, IMHO. > -> have less regular technical/co-op focused meetings > -> use mailing lists and irc for technical stuff > -> ... > > I've two personal and strong preferences: > -> not have too many meetings > -> keep discussion focused, for instance, as been done with UI discussion > > Comments and suggestions. > > Andrew >