From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26764 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2007 21:57:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 26757 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Feb 2007 21:57:13 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:57:09 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1ELv7ps028922 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:57:07 -0500 Received: from pobox.hsv.redhat.com (pobox.hsv.redhat.com [172.16.16.12]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1ELv6x9004920; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:57:06 -0500 Received: from [10.11.14.46] (vpn-14-46.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.46]) by pobox.hsv.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l1ELv5wT012854; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:57:05 -0500 Message-ID: <45D385B0.4010308@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:57:00 -0000 From: Phil Muldoon User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: frysk Subject: Re: user discussion & meeting and more meetings References: <45D34165.7090300@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <45D34165.7090300@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00130.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > > There are several ideas to kick around: > -> expand Wednesday morning's meeting to include other matters > -> add a second weekly meeting > -> Cycle the Wednesday meeting so that it alternates between user / > technical / co-op focused > -> have less regular technical/co-op focused meetings > -> use mailing lists and irc for technical stuff > -> ... > > I've two personal and strong preferences: > -> not have too many meetings > -> keep discussion focused, for instance, as been done with UI discussion > > Comments and suggestions. Personally I find short meetings more productive than longer ones. So two 30 minute meetings, for me, are always invariably more productive that one hour long plus. This is especially true when the meetings require close following of both the speech on the phone, as well as following prompts on the vnc session. That being said, I personally think the weekly UI meetings are just going to run into each other, as the deliverable from one meeting to the other take more than one week to complete. My own personal preference would be cycle the Wednesday meeting, accordingly. Regards Phil > > Andrew >