From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15775 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2007 20:16:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 15761 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Feb 2007 20:16:22 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:16:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1KKGBB6024005 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:16:11 -0500 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1KKFwOC030525; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:15:58 -0500 Received: from [172.16.14.160] (tow.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.160]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l1KKFvkE015205; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:15:57 -0500 Message-ID: <45DB56FD.1040102@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:16:00 -0000 From: Nurdin Premji User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney , frysk Subject: Re: user discussion & meeting and more meetings References: <45D34165.7090300@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <45D34165.7090300@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00144.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > lets throw this open for debate; > > On Wednesday's @9:30 CA-EST is a discussion about UI aspects of > frysk. The discussion ranges from utilities through to the gnome > components. The discussion has the following goals: > -> focus on end user experience > -> be focused - very limited topic list, shorter meeting > -> have clear outcomes, and follow them through > -> occasionally, the opportunity to explore new ideas > At the moment I'm picking things driven largely by active work that > I'm aware of. Going forward, I hope this will evolve into more of a > weekly show-n-tell - an opportunity to highlight progress and gain > quick feedback on new work. The discussion is proving to be largely > non-technical. > > Elena is asking that there also be made available time where non user > issues can be addressed: > -> a free technical exchange > -> co-operative planning and administration > (At present there's an internal meeting that touches on this). > > There are several ideas to kick around: > -> expand Wednesday morning's meeting to include other matters > -> add a second weekly meeting > -> Cycle the Wednesday meeting so that it alternates between user / > technical / co-op focused > -> have less regular technical/co-op focused meetings > -> use mailing lists and irc for technical stuff > -> ... > > I've two personal and strong preferences: > -> not have too many meetings > -> keep discussion focused, for instance, as been done with UI discussion > > Comments and suggestions. > > Andrew > I lean towards cycling through useability/technical meetings.