From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <frysk-return-1415-listarch-frysk=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11830 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2007 21:37:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 11818 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Feb 2007 21:37:24 -0000
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_20
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from agminet01.oracle.com (HELO agminet01.oracle.com) (141.146.126.228)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:37:12 +0000
Received: from rgmsgw02.us.oracle.com (rgmsgw02.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.52]) 	by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id l1KLVlIT001986; 	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:31:47 -0600
Received: from [10.8.0.10] (ca-server1.us.oracle.com [139.185.48.5]) 	by rgmsgw02.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.2.4) with ESMTP id l1KLViGe020375; 	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:31:45 -0700
Message-ID: <45DB6800.7020503@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:37:00 -0000
From: Elena Zannoni <elena.zannoni@oracle.com>
Organization: Oracle USA Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060913)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stan Cox <scox@redhat.com>
CC: Frysk List <frysk@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: user discussion & meeting and more meetings
References: <45D34165.7090300@redhat.com> <1171998220.14902.25.camel@multics.rdu.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1171998220.14902.25.camel@multics.rdu.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI=
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI=
X-Whitelist: TRUE
X-Whitelist: TRUE
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <frysk.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:frysk-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:frysk@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:frysk-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00145.txt.bz2

Stan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 12:05 -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>   
>> -> Cycle the Wednesday meeting so that it alternates between user / 
>> technical / co-op focused 
>>     
>
> I vote for cycling the meetings, with week 1 for
> planning/administration/idea exchange and week 2 for technical
> discussion.
>
>
>
>   

A project management meeting every 2 weeks is not going to cut it 
unfortunately,
given the scope and the size of the project it needs to be done every week.
Doing UI every 2 weeks is reasonable.