From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21746 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2007 02:09:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 21737 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2007 02:09:49 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:09:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1S29PfQ012095; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:09:25 -0500 Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (lacrosse.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.154]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1S29PQi016378; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:09:25 -0500 Received: from [10.11.14.127] (vpn-14-127.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.127]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l1S29NpC004584; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:09:24 -0500 Message-ID: <45E4E449.9000708@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:09:00 -0000 From: Chris Moller User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060913) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Elena Zannoni CC: Andrew Cagney , frysk@sourceware.org Subject: Re: frysk meeting 2007-02-28 9:30 east References: <45E4B9F8.7010005@redhat.com> <45E4DE84.60601@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <45E4DE84.60601@oracle.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF6C938A26BF6BD599EADC591" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on sourceware.org X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00166.txt.bz2 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF6C938A26BF6BD599EADC591 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 391 Personally, I'd rather do status stuff via frysk@--all anyone who's interested in the various stati does is write them down, so why not just start with them that way in the first place? (Not to mention my attention span these days is significantly less than the length of recent meetings.) Elena Zannoni wrote: > I'd like to propose that we do a status round table at this week call. > > --------------enigF6C938A26BF6BD599EADC591 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-length: 251 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF5ORTmpMCeQnqFMkRAu16AJwJptEx0Sh0VY3pZmHCUeBeIbBfJwCfRCcK Zj/9We6jzeE7KjPj1RdHmls= =HSHF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF6C938A26BF6BD599EADC591--