From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22281 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2007 13:43:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 22274 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2007 13:43:48 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TW_FH X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:43:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l27Dhgct015632 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:43:42 -0500 Received: from pobox.stuttgart.redhat.com (pobox.stuttgart.redhat.com [172.16.2.10]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l27Dha82006267; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:43:36 -0500 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.stuttgart.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l27DhW7q007644; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:43:33 +0100 Message-ID: <45EEC184.8010700@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:43:00 -0000 From: Tim Moore User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: Stan Cox , Frysk List Subject: Re: fhpd References: <1172765357.27599.17.camel@multics.rdu.redhat.com> <45ED9747.9000003@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <45ED9747.9000003@redhat.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00188.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Cagney wrote: > Hi Stan, > > I'm not sure what you mean by never regains I/O control. > > One key issue though is wiring the child process up to a > frysk.sys.PseudoTerminal - otherwise the process and fhpd will be > fighting over control of the terminal. Don't forget that there are two > cases to handle: I checked in changes that implement the "run" command in the CLI command line. It will be quite easy to adapt the fhpd program to pass an argument to run a program named in its arguments. This works well for our simple looping test cases, but I also didn't think about the terminal issue. > > - fhpd command line where it clearly should create the PTY What should the other side of the pty be bound to? An xterm? > - UI where the pty will be part of a Terminal panel and the code should > bind the created process to that Tim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7sGEeDhWHdXrDRURAkSCAKCmIQytNY8hY7bbvWLOBQ65iEgarACfc/3x HfdWe0wEDL53GNbmNkNQrT0= =PsgH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----