From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <frysk-return-1564-listarch-frysk=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26180 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2007 15:46:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 26172 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Apr 2007 15:46:56 -0000
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:46:47 +0100
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) 	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l34FkjTk015479 	for <frysk@sourceware.org>; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:46:45 -0400
Received: from pobox.hsv.redhat.com (pobox.hsv.redhat.com [172.16.16.12]) 	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l34Fki6U025237; 	Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:46:44 -0400
Received: from [10.11.14.25] (vpn-14-25.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.25]) 	by pobox.hsv.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l34Fkh50019268; 	Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:46:43 -0400
Message-ID: <4613C862.1000309@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:46:00 -0000
From: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
CC: frysk <frysk@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: refactoring frysk.proc.*Ptrace* into frysk.proc.ptrace ;; ditto  for  frysk.proc.core?
References: <4613C748.6040804@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4613C748.6040804@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <frysk.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:frysk-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:frysk@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:frysk-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Just a thought, with a second proc implementation, will this make life 
> easier?

Not sure what you mean? You mean just rename the classes or create 
separate namespaces below proc like:

frysk.proc.ptrace

with classes LinuxPtrace{Host|Proc|Task}{State}.java in there?

and same with:

frysk.proc.core

The seperate namespace thing makes sense to me, as proc is really 
getting cluttered.