From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9674 invoked by alias); 7 May 2007 17:08:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 9667 invoked by uid 22791); 7 May 2007 17:08:43 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,BOTNET_SERVERWORDS,BOTNET_SOHO,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 May 2007 17:08:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l47H8cjI020710; Mon, 7 May 2007 13:08:38 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l47H8bqL003289; Mon, 7 May 2007 13:08:37 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l47H8bwl031815; Mon, 7 May 2007 13:08:37 -0400 Message-ID: <463F5D16.5050008@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 19:44:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070301) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Van Hees CC: frysk Subject: Re: stack call References: <463F331C.8050302@redhat.com> <20070507152114.GB20444@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20070507152114.GB20444@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00127.txt.bz2 Kris, I would assume impromptu call like this use the standard dial-in numbers and are open (i'll be more explicit next time). And the main goal is to facilitate a timely non-technical discussion with the immediate players. For technical discussion, #frysk, frysk@ or Wednesday are always the preferred channels. Andrew Kris Van Hees wrote: > A few questions... > > 1. Is this an open call? I am willing to bet that I am not the only one > who is also interested in this topic and would be quite interested in > technical topics discussion like this (and hopefully able to > contribute to it). If not an open call, err, why not? :) > > 2. If it is an open call, it might be a good idea to post basic > call-in information, even if things like passcode are best left out > of emails to public mailing lists. Can always put in a reference on > who to ask for the passcode. > > 3. Can calls like this perhaps be announced a bit more in advance so > people may be able to make arrangements to join the call? > > Cheers, > Kris > > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:09:32AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> Phil, Nurdin, Sami, Stan, >> >> I'd like to set up a quick call this morning to discuss next steps for >> stack-back-tracing. In particular using .debug_info to create a more >> detailed back-trace. >> >> I'll reserve 11 Toronto time. >> >> Andrew >> >>