Re: Outline Proposal: add getMaps() to abstract Proc.java

[Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>]

Phil,

Like the idea.  While the purest might suggest that for every field 
there should be a getter, I've found that having the fields "public 
final" is more pragmatic.

Andrew

Phil Muldoon wrote:
> Phil Muldoon wrote:
>
> In addition, I just realized that we might as well give the name of 
> the map while "we are there", otherwise the user will just have to go 
> to the same spot to find it. So add a String name; to the data of the 
> maps class.
>
>>
>>
>> in Maps.java
>>
>> // Think of a different name for this class
>> public class Map
>> {
>>    public long addressLow;
>>    public long addressHigh;
>>    public boolean permRead;
>>    public boolean permWrite;
>>    public boolean permExecute;
>>    public boolean shared;
>>    public long offset;
>>    public int devMajor;
>>    public int devMinor;
>>    public int inode;       public int pathnameOffset;
>>    public int pathnameLength;
>>
>>    public void Map(....)
>>    {
>>       // implement constructor setters here
>>        ............
>>        ............
>>    }
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>