* "up" and "down", "top" and "bottom" again
@ 2007-06-06 21:46 Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2007-06-06 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: frysk
Picking up from today's meeting and going through more carefully.
"up" and "down": The just problem seems to just be with the commands.
Long long ago it was agreed that "up" would behave as "inner" (i.e. go
towards the top) and "down" as "outer" (i.e., go towards the bottom) and
not mimic gdb. It seems to have been switched somehow. See:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/frysk/2006-q4/msg00196.html
"where": The possability of, in the HPD, printing stacks bottom-to-top
instead of top-to-bottom came up. That way the last stack printed would
be the outer-most (and so wouldn't be scrolled off the screen). That
would however make it inconsistent with fstack and the gui, and put the
"top" frame at the "bottom" of the screen.
"inner" and "outer": Nurden? suggested adding these as commands to just
get rid of the confusion. Sounds like a good idea :-)
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-06-06 17:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-06-06 21:46 "up" and "down", "top" and "bottom" again Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).