From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <frysk-return-1815-listarch-frysk=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 25443 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2007 13:09:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 25434 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jun 2007 13:09:32 -0000
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:09:30 +0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) 	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5DD9SJT015469 	for <frysk@sourceware.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:09:28 -0400
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) 	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5DD9RXe026878 	for <frysk@sourceware.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:09:27 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) 	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5DD9RkZ006333 	for <frysk@sourceware.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:09:27 -0400
Message-ID: <466FEC94.4000808@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:12:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: frysk@sourceware.org
Subject: adopting OpenJDK's coding standard[?]?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <frysk.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:frysk-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:frysk@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:frysk-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00259.txt.bz2

Hi,

Since OpenJDK is going to subsume CLASSPATH as the Free Java library, 
and OpenJDK follows Sun/Java coding conventions (sort of mostly :-), I 
can't think of a reason for continuing with the GNU format.  In 
addition, its the format that EMACS already follows; and there should be 
good indentation tools around.  The only -ve is that Eclipse might still 
need to be, er, "tweaked".

Topic for todays meeting.

Would be grandparented until changed.
Re-indentation should be a separate commit.

Andrew