From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7493 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2007 21:55:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 7481 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jun 2007 21:55:48 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:55:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5DLtarT003538 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:55:36 -0400 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5DLtNq3030419; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:55:35 -0400 Received: from tow.toronto.redhat.com (tow.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.160]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5DLtMO2013788; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:55:23 -0400 Message-ID: <46706866.6000504@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:16:00 -0000 From: Nurdin Premji User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: frysk@sourceware.org Subject: Re: adopting OpenJDK's coding standard[?]? References: <466FEC94.4000808@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <466FEC94.4000808@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00265.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > Hi, > > Since OpenJDK is going to subsume CLASSPATH as the Free Java library, > and OpenJDK follows Sun/Java coding conventions (sort of mostly :-), I > can't think of a reason for continuing with the GNU format. In > addition, its the format that EMACS already follows; and there should > be good indentation tools around. The only -ve is that Eclipse might > still need to be, er, "tweaked". > > Topic for todays meeting. > > Would be grandparented until changed. > Re-indentation should be a separate commit. > > Andrew > I'm all for it. I believe Eclipse's default formatting standard is the sun standard, so just deleting the custom formatter spec should work (if needed I'm sure there is a sun standard file for eclipse). As for the "tweaking" the only issue I know about is a possible inconsistency between editor tab sizes and formatter tab sizes, so eclipse users should check both these settings to keep them consistent.