From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2945 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2007 14:08:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 2911 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2007 14:08:57 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:08:53 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5EE8mhZ030672; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:08:48 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5EE8mwW017009; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:08:48 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5EE8lGs024556; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:08:47 -0400 Message-ID: <46714BFF.5060501@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:24:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Wielaard CC: frysk Subject: Re: frysk builds cleanly on Fedora 7 References: <466FEE64.6010404@redhat.com> <1181813665.4474.14.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> <1181813757.4474.16.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> In-Reply-To: <1181813757.4474.16.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00274.txt.bz2 The problem isn't new: #include #include the build system considers that to be a system include. Andrew Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:34 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > >> Great! It does build cleanly now on Fedora 7, but there does seem to be >> a make -j dependency problem. Don't know if it is newly introduced, I >> believe I have seen this before in the past. But I hit it twice already >> today. It seems cni .h headers can be generated too late. >> > > OK, I see it isn't a new problem since Mike reported it already last > week: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4427 > > Cheers, > > Mark >