From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10464 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2007 14:24:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 10455 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2007 14:24:32 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:24:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5EEORKp008646 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:24:27 -0400 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5EEOQ2D023501; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:24:26 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn-14-241.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.241]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5EEOPiH004905; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:24:25 -0400 Message-ID: <46714F98.2040901@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:17:00 -0000 From: Adam Jocksch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nurdin Premji CC: Andrew Cagney , frysk@sourceware.org Subject: Re: adopting OpenJDK's coding standard[?]? References: <466FEC94.4000808@redhat.com> <46706866.6000504@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <46706866.6000504@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00275.txt.bz2 Nurdin Premji wrote: > > As for the "tweaking" the only issue I know about is a possible > inconsistency between editor tab sizes and formatter tab sizes, so > eclipse users should check both these settings to keep them consistent. > > Hard tabs would avoid this issue, but I guess they aren't en vogue right now, are they :) Adam