From: Adam Jocksch <ajocksch@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
Cc: Stan Cox <scox@redhat.com>, Frysk List <frysk@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: hpd command for DisplayValues
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46717870.4080805@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <467177C3.3090405@redhat.com>
Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Adam Jocksch wrote:
>> Hrm, maybe. Although reading in the hpd spec: "By defining
>> actionpoints, the user may request in advance that target program
>> execution stop
>
> Nice quote, the display object doesn't fit that model since it is
> passive - it doesn't directly trigger a stop since it doesn't
> implement a mechanism for detecting changes in the data (that would be
> watch). Instead it detects when the variable has changed after a stop.
>
> For the command line, consider this:
>
>> [] break main
>> [] run ....
>> main hit
>> [] print argc
>> ...
>> [] step
>> [] print argc
>> [] step
>
> vs:
>
>> [] break main
>> [] run ....
>> main hit
>> [] display argc
>> ...
>> [] step
>> ... value of argc changed from 4 to -1
>> [] step
>> [] step
>> Value of argc changed from -1 to 4
>
> For a graphical interface the object facilitates the efficient
> implementation of a variable display window - it will only trigger a
> redraw of the display elements of the X display when there's something
> new to draw.
>
> Andrew
>
>> under certain conditions". Do we want the display to be similar to a
>> watchpoint, except it applies to an expression rather than a single
>> variable? Or do we want it to be an expression that is displayed when
>> the program stops (I remember Andrew saying something about how gdb
>> does this, and it's bad, so we probably want to avoid that).
>>
>> While what the DisplayValue object is capable is well defined, I
>> guess I'm not 100% sure of how it will be used.
>
That sounds similar to what I had envisioned.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-14 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-14 16:40 Adam Jocksch
2007-06-14 17:04 ` Stan Cox
2007-06-14 17:15 ` Adam Jocksch
2007-06-14 17:18 ` Andrew Cagney
2007-06-14 17:34 ` Adam Jocksch [this message]
2007-06-14 17:51 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46717870.4080805@redhat.com \
--to=ajocksch@redhat.com \
--cc=cagney@redhat.com \
--cc=frysk@sourceware.org \
--cc=scox@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).