From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
Cc: frysk <frysk@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: frysk.proc.{ptrace,corefile} -> frysk.proc.{live,dead}
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4677155F.5030009@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1182192973.4534.90.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org>
Mark,
Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 14:02 -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>> Reading between the lines I suspect your concern here isn't so much
>> about this specific change but about the rate of change in general?
>>
>
> No, more the rate of changes I don't really understand the why of. I
> like to have more design discussion on the list so we all know why and
> what changes are proposed and being worked on.
>
>
>> Remember Frysk as a project is relatively free flowing when it comes to
>> its code and refactoring. We don't spend days or weeks musing over
>> choices, or trying to design perfection. Instead we design for todays
>> problem and let tomorrows developers re-design for their future. This
>> gives us much flexibility while while ensuring that we are focused on
>> real rather than hypothetical needs.
>>
>
> That is good. But what I am missing is the actual problem statement.
> What exactly isn't possible today and what is possible tomorrow after
> such a change is made. My concern is that some of this is just
> refactoring for refactorings sake. That is why I ask the why and what
> questions.
>
>
Sorry I don't follow, the but. This is good.
Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-18 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-13 13:17 Andrew Cagney
2007-06-14 10:11 ` Mark Wielaard
2007-06-14 14:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2007-06-15 9:05 ` Mark Wielaard
2007-06-15 15:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2007-06-15 19:44 ` Mark Wielaard
2007-06-18 18:15 ` Andrew Cagney
2007-06-18 19:06 ` Mark Wielaard
2007-06-18 23:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2007-06-19 8:59 ` Mark Wielaard
2007-06-19 22:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2007-06-20 9:21 ` Mark Wielaard
2007-06-19 8:32 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4677155F.5030009@redhat.com \
--to=cagney@redhat.com \
--cc=frysk@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark@klomp.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).