Re: 32-64 branch?

[Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>]

Kris,

Branching is cheap (even allowing for CVS); and it lets us cite the code 
base against which discussion was held.  I can always cut one myself.

Andrew

Kris Van Hees wrote:
> I'd typically do that because it is indeed the easiest way to ensure
> that you can access the same source code.  In this case however I think
> it is major overkill, because the changes are minimal.  I'll be posting
> a diff that can be fed to patch prior to the meeting so everyone will
> have the minimal changes.  It's really just enabling the two windows so
> the problems with them can be demonstrated.
>
> 	Cheers,
> 	Kris
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 06:37:16PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>   
>> Kris,
>>
>> On IRC you mentioned:
>>
>> Jun 19 15:11:15 SqRoot  mjw: For tomorrow's meeting, we won't be able to 
>> use a std frysk build due to the two particular windows being disabled 
>> on x86_64, and it needing an x86_64 either way to show the problems.
>>
>> can I suggest cutting a branch and putting the changes there?  That way 
>> we can access them and build locally if needed.
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>>