From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7126 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2007 17:54:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 7118 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jul 2007 17:54:00 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:53:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l63HruLA012386 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:53:56 -0400 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l63HrskT019042 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:53:55 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn-14-145.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.145]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l63HrqHh011268 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:53:53 -0400 Message-ID: <468A8D2F.1000302@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:54:00 -0000 From: Adam Jocksch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: frysk Subject: Re: Deleting a Display References: <468A771B.1030907@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <468A771B.1030907@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 Adam Jocksch wrote: > Now that we can create expression displays with the hpd, what should > the syntax be to delete a display? 'delete' is currently being used to > remove breakpoints, should it work with displays as well? The other > thought I had was something like display remove . > > Any other ideas/suggestions? > > Adam Looking through the hpd I see the following: > delete {actionpoint-list | -enabled | -disabled | -break | -watch | -barrier | -all} > actions {actionpoint-list | -enabled | -disabled | -break | -watch | -barrier} > disable {actionpoint-list | -enabled | -disabled | -break | -watch | -barrier} > enable {actionpoint-list | -enabled | -disabled | -break | -watch | -barrier} It seems to me that we want all of these to apply to displays as well. Is there any particular reason that we shouldn't do this? Otherwise I'll move ahead and implement them. Adam