From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10932 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2007 18:34:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 10834 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jul 2007 18:34:50 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:34:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l63IYhgX010804 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:34:43 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l63IYgVY007199; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:34:42 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l63IYfgS017260; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:34:42 -0400 Message-ID: <468A96CC.4030609@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:34:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Jocksch CC: frysk Subject: Re: Deleting a Display References: <468A771B.1030907@redhat.com> <468A8D2F.1000302@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <468A8D2F.1000302@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 Adam Jocksch wrote: > Adam Jocksch wrote: >> Now that we can create expression displays with the hpd, what should >> the syntax be to delete a display? 'delete' is currently being used >> to remove breakpoints, should it work with displays as well? The >> other thought I had was something like display remove . >> >> Any other ideas/suggestions? >> >> Adam > Looking through the hpd I see the following: > > delete {actionpoint-list | -enabled | -disabled | -break | -watch | > -barrier | -all} > > actions {actionpoint-list | -enabled | -disabled | -break | -watch > | -barrier} > > disable {actionpoint-list | -enabled | -disabled | -break | -watch > | -barrier} > > enable {actionpoint-list | -enabled | -disabled | -break | -watch | > -barrier} > > It seems to me that we want all of these to apply to displays as well. > Is there any particular reason that we shouldn't do this? Otherwise > I'll move ahead and implement them. I can't think of one :-) "delete " would seem very intuitive. Andrew >