From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18710 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2007 15:12:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 18699 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2007 15:12:33 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:12:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6BFCJNY006331; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:12:19 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6BFCI8T007172; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:12:18 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6BFCFHC025778; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:12:16 -0400 Message-ID: <4694F361.2080808@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:12:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Van Hees CC: Mark Wielaard , frysk@sourceware.org, cagney@sourceware.org Subject: Re: frysk-top ChangeLog References: <20070710160014.27101.qmail@sourceware.org> <1184147639.4322.25.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> <4694DC53.4040903@redhat.com> <20070711134714.GC11657@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20070711134714.GC11657@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 Remember, this web-only information is already available on the web via CVS. Mark is right though, there are a few other stray change-log entries, I'll clean that up; and add a trap to ensure that any extra changelog entries don't stray into that top-level ChangeLog file. Andrew Kris Van Hees wrote: > This brings up the question: why don't htdocs have changelog entries? I > can't see a good reason against having them, and there are benefits to > having changelog entries for this stuff, either way. > > I also have to second Mark's opinion that simply removing his entry > rather than talking about it seems a bit harsh. Obviously, Mark did > feel that there was a good reason to have a changelog entry for the > patch he commited. That alone should be enough reason to make this a > matter to discuss. > > Cheers, > Kris > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 09:34:11AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> htdocs do not have changelogs entries; they never have. >> >> Something more interesting is why htdocs do not get posted to frysk-cvs; >> I'm investigating. >> >> Mark Wielaard wrote: >> >>> Hi Andrew, >>> >>> On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:00 +0000, cagney@sourceware.org wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Log message: >>>> Remove stray changelog entry.x >>>> >>>> Patches: >>>> http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/frysk-top/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=frysk&r1=1.87&r2=1.88 >>>> >>>> >>> Why did you remove my ChangeLog entry? I explicitly put that there to >>> document the change and because other ChangeLog entries for htdocs >>> related files also went into that file. If you feel they are better >>> documented in some other ChangeLog file please just tell me instead of >>> silently removing patches so I know why/where I should document these >>> things. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Mark >>> >>>