From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18720 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2007 15:47:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 18711 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jul 2007 15:47:44 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:47:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6UFlcpC001873 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:47:38 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6UFlcpN008654 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:47:38 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6UFlbW5004188 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:47:37 -0400 Message-ID: <46AE081A.8070503@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:47:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: frysk@sourceware.org Subject: Testing frysk.testbed.Funit* Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00222.txt.bz2 Hi, I'm looking at ways to more directly test the frysk.testbed.Funit* classes (e.g., FunitExec, DetachedAckProcess) that wrap PKGLIBDIR/funit-* utilities, but am finding that the most effective route is to use frysk.proc's framework - duplicating the existing frysk.proc tests exercising frysk.proc functionality that is effectively testing that code. I could duplicate the tests but it seems redundant. Any thoughts on a strategy? Andrew