Mark Wielaard wrote:
> This doesn't compile on FC6. I didn't know that you could actually throw
> a 'null', and so didn't the compiler :) But you are right according to
> the spec that this is allowed and the semantics is precisely as if you
> actually created a new NullPointerException at that place and then threw
> it.

Interesting, I was thinking that maybe this is a typo that was supposed
to read "return null" instead of "throw null"...

PM