From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29762 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2007 21:28:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 29629 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Aug 2007 21:28:09 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:28:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l7KLS1aF002076; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:28:02 -0400 Received: from pobox-2.corp.redhat.com (pobox-2.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l7KLS1an030893; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:28:01 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn-14-159.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.159]) by pobox-2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l7KLS1Av022898; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:28:01 -0400 Message-ID: <46CA0760.7020906@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:28:00 -0000 From: Phil Muldoon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Girard CC: Frysk Hackers Subject: Re: Questions about build web documentation References: <1186647756.3865.14.camel@micmac> <1186655070.3747.12.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> <1186950854.3853.29.camel@micmac> In-Reply-To: <1186950854.3853.29.camel@micmac> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00311.txt.bz2 Thomas Girard wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. > > Please review the attached patch for htdocs/build/index.html. > Apologies for the delay in this. The patch looks fine to me. > I'm wondering if tracker bugs sould be split for Ubuntu and Debian > releases the way they are for Red Hat? > Is there a casual or implied relationship between Ubuntu and Debian that is on-going? Other than Ubuntu was derived from Debian. If not, then they should be treated as different products, with different trackers? My stock opinion here is "whatever is sane for the maintainer". Regards Phil