From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12962 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2007 14:26:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 12929 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Aug 2007 14:26:15 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from agminet01.oracle.com (HELO agminet01.oracle.com) (141.146.126.228) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:26:05 +0000 Received: from agmgw2.us.oracle.com (agmgw2.us.oracle.com [152.68.180.213]) by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id l7OEPh0q030267; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:25:43 -0500 Received: from acsmt351.oracle.com (acsmt351.oracle.com [141.146.40.151]) by agmgw2.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.0/Switch-3.2.0) with ESMTP id l7OEPhNA021914; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:25:43 -0600 Received: from c-76-19-29-178.hsd1.ma.comcast.net by rcsmt252.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3154611791187965535; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:25:35 -0600 Message-ID: <46CEEA89.7030803@oracle.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:26:00 -0000 From: Elena Zannoni Organization: Oracle USA Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: Mark Wielaard , Kris Van Hees , frysk@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Again the build is broken :( References: <20070824055011.GA19064@oracle.com> <1187943385.3749.12.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> <46CED04A.9070003@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <46CED04A.9070003@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00341.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> Got more info on the build? Architecture, distro, gcc, automake/autoconf >> versions, etc? > > Seems its only triggered by newer autotools. > > Andrew > This leads to the question as to what are the standard development platforms for frysk. FC6 and FC7? Or is older stuff still used? Should there be a standard platform where pre-commit build and tests should be performed.