From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15010 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2007 12:00:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 15003 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Oct 2007 12:00:44 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:00:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l9BC0cCj028285 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:00:38 -0400 Received: from pobox.stuttgart.redhat.com (pobox.stuttgart.redhat.com [172.16.2.10]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l9BC0XFD014487 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:00:36 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.stuttgart.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l9BC0Vki016654 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:00:32 +0200 Message-ID: <470E105E.7000601@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:00:00 -0000 From: Tim Moore User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: frysk Subject: vendor branches in git repository X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.3.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q4/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I've pushed all the vendor branches I could identify to the sourceware .git repository with the names vendor/LIBUNWIND, etc. Please let me know if anything is missing or they don't resemble what you imported. The merge points of these branches back into the main trunk didn't survive the cvs export process (or didn't exist in the first place) so in Git these branches never appear to be merged back. I'm going to assert that it's not necessary to massage the history to recreate the merges, as the commits to the mainline that did the merges are certainly there, but if you disagree, let me know. What other branches in CVS are important to preserve in the git repository? I'm going to do a pass over the git repository to correct email names of contributors, so don't get too attached to your clones of the current repo; the history will change out from under you. Tim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHDhBeeDhWHdXrDRURAr+EAJkBP/JwYKayJxtOKCWtDNQ5HU3jKwCeK2K5 1I8slI/L4C18AkdYkLMyBbY= =xadx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----