From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30264 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2007 16:33:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 30235 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2007 16:33:14 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:33:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l9QGX8Dp025985; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:33:08 -0400 Received: from pobox.stuttgart.redhat.com (pobox.stuttgart.redhat.com [172.16.2.10]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l9QGX7so006694; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:33:07 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.stuttgart.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l9QGX0qi011230; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:33:01 +0200 Message-ID: <472216B9.5090600@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:33:00 -0000 From: Tim Moore User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Wielaard CC: frysk Subject: Re: frysk git repository References: <471F7C3A.4020204@redhat.com> <1193410781.2931.2.camel@hermans.wildebeest.org> In-Reply-To: <1193410781.2931.2.camel@hermans.wildebeest.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.3.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q4/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi Tim, > > On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 19:09 +0200, Tim Moore wrote: >> Also, commit messages make most sense in the git world, with the various tools that print >> out logs, if you begin your message with a one-line summary, and a blank line. After that >> you can include the ChangeLog entries we have now. > > Is there a way to include the actual diffs of the patches that are > pushed into the repo to the commit list to make reviewing changes > easier? I can tweak the script, but I think that falls into the category of "too much information" since you can review the changes locally using either the git command line tools or gitk. Tim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHIha5eDhWHdXrDRURAgUFAJ9QXRBtpOYIrgDfjD2uJn86OjdT2ACdF3k2 lZgnMyItckan7938zVdFbCA= =eHgY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----