public inbox for frysk@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
Cc: frysk <frysk@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Doing a vendor branch import and merge if libunwind
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 21:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4745F3ED.4040107@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1195740451.2970.41.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org>

Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since there was an somewhat important memory clobbering patch in
> upstream libunwind I decided to refresh our libunwind copy. And since
> the patch was so small (the rest was really stuff we already had in our
> tree, but were not also upstream) I hoped this was easy. It was a bit of
> a struggle though, but mostly because I don't know git enough. Here is
> what I did. Comments on how to improve this process appreciated.
>   
> - Get the libunwind vendor branch
>   $ git-checkout vendor/LIBUNWIND
>   
Perhaps instead of "remove"; "replace"
> - Remove old stuff
>   $ rm -rf frysk-import/libunwind
> - Get upstream stuff and put it in
>   (make sure you don't accidentially copy over the upstream .git dir)
>   $ cp -r ~/upstream/libunwind frysk-import/
> - Commit (use a commit messsage like "Import of libunwind version   
>           libunwind-20071122") and push
>   $ git-commit -a && git-push
>
> The vendor branch is now updated
>
> - Merge to the trunk
>   $ git-checkout master
>   $ git-merge vendor/LIBUNWIND
> - Resolve the conflicts using git-rm for files not needed,
>   editing files with conflict markers and git-add each one after
>   resolving the issues.
> - Do a full clean build and double check the test results.
>   [.. lots of time passes...]
> - Commit and push the result (git will have generated a merge message
>   for you already that you can use in the commit).
>   $ got commit && git push
>
> If too much time has passed since the start the push will fail. Trying
> to do a git fetch origin; git rebase origin seem to fail, so you have to
> just do a git pull && git push then (which creates an extra merge
> message, but that seems just fine).
>
> If we have a good workflow we should update the webpages.
> Thanks to Tim for helping me out when I got stuck on irc.
>
>   
Please don't hold back here; this is clearly far better than what we 
have now; so should replace what we have now

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-22 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-22 14:07 Mark Wielaard
2007-11-22 21:26 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2007-11-23 12:29   ` Mark Wielaard
2007-11-23 19:29     ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4745F3ED.4040107@redhat.com \
    --to=cagney@redhat.com \
    --cc=frysk@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=mark@klomp.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).