From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2505 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2007 14:40:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 2486 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Nov 2007 14:40:36 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:40:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lAREeSwJ017005; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:40:28 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lAREeRuw009064; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:40:27 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lAREeQA2010610; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:40:26 -0500 Message-ID: <474C2C60.1010703@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:40:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Wielaard CC: frysk@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Quick pc hack for exe loading References: <1195817730.2981.21.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> <47470A62.3070906@redhat.com> <47470E4C.5040307@redhat.com> <1196073636.3088.17.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> <474AF9C2.2080607@redhat.com> <1196151942.3054.5.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> In-Reply-To: <1196151942.3054.5.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q4/txt/msg00182.txt.bz2 Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > Right that is the question. Since you introduced the FIXMEs and are > working on this refactoring I assumed that you would fix it when you > were ready and nothing prevented it anymore. Which is the reason I > didn't change it myself. > I'm more than happy to fix the existing; however, this is new. Andrew