Re: a simpler logger [?]

[Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>]

FYI,

I've marked up frysk.expunit to use this logger (so people can see it 
working).  Enable it with something like:
   ./TestRunner -trace FINE frysk.hpd.TestLoadCommand
or:
  ./TtestRunner -trace frysk.expunit=FINEST  frysk.hpd.TestLoadCommand

Andrew

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just added a frysk.rsl (really simple logger?) package as a 
> possible alternative to the java logging framework we're currently 
> using.  The "advantages" as I'll spin them are:
>
> -> the logging call is unlocked (at least in the logger level)
> so the ongoing saga of older log implementations deadlocking is avoided
>
> -> nested logging works
>
> -> it supports a completer interface
> so that << (fhpd) frysk log frysk.proc.<TAB> >> can give a known list 
> of loggers
>
> -> [I think] the call interface is simpler and lighter
> for instance << log.fine(this, "adding foo") >> or << log.fine(this, 
> "adding foo=", foo); >> (we can add more methods as we need them :-)
>
> thoughts?
>
> Andrew
>