From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23593 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2008 21:04:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 23559 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jan 2008 21:04:21 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:04:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m08L42wO000963 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:04:02 -0500 Received: from pobox-2.corp.redhat.com (pobox-2.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m08L42ZS001261; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:04:02 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn-6-14.fab.redhat.com [10.33.6.14]) by pobox-2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m08L40VB018343; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:04:01 -0500 Message-ID: <4783E540.6030306@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:04:00 -0000 From: Phil Muldoon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: frysk Subject: Re: local vs remote; core vs exe vs ... References: <4783C6A8.7020102@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4783C6A8.7020102@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > > Does this look reasonable? ...? Yes > > What are the consequences? Immediately comes to mind are two things: Wire protocol. Transfer protocols: ssh? telnet? what does remotemachine: donate? AURL/I or some type? Still thinking on the Host creation in the rest of the email. Regards Phil