From: Andrew Cagney <email@example.com>
To: frysk <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: "int pid" replaced with ProcessIdentifier
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47AB291E.email@example.com> (raw)
I've pushed a low-level change so that frysk.sys's process code uses a
ProcessIdentifier object instead of "int pid"s; there is one
ProcessIdentifier per "pid". The change is slowly working its way
through frysk.proc.live; it won't be taken further.
The motivation is simple, while "int pid" looks small and efficient; it
turns out that the code using it really needed an object (leaking
something like <<new Integer(pid)>>) to either log or hash the pid.
With a proper object both of these cases can be greatly simplified.
next reply other threads:[~2008-02-07 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-07 15:52 Andrew Cagney [this message]
2008-02-14 11:00 ` Mark Wielaard
2008-02-14 14:25 ` Andrew Cagney
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).