* meeting 2008-04-02 - versions and releases
@ 2008-04-02 15:29 Andrew Cagney
2008-04-02 17:24 ` Sami Wagiaalla
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2008-04-02 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: frysk
We discussed versions and releases again; the intent is:
-> the release occurs the first Wednesday of each month:
- Monday/Tuesday do sanity checks and update NEWS
- Wednesday 0:00 GMT is tentative branch date
- Wednesday's meeting we check we're ok; review NEWS; and perhaps add
last minute fixes
-> version
- This release will be version 0.2; the next 0.3; and so on, if we reach
0.9 then it isn't anything special
-> NEWS
- going into the Wednesday meeting; we should add news items, but we'll
use Wednesday to review it
-> this month
We can get news stuff updated today and cut the official branch tonight
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: meeting 2008-04-02 - versions and releases
2008-04-02 15:29 meeting 2008-04-02 - versions and releases Andrew Cagney
@ 2008-04-02 17:24 ` Sami Wagiaalla
2008-04-04 14:47 ` Phil Muldoon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sami Wagiaalla @ 2008-04-02 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: frysk
> -> NEWS
> - going into the Wednesday meeting; we should add news items, but we'll
> use Wednesday to review it
>
News items should be considered on a per-commit basis; if your change is
news worthy then add a thing to the news file. Then, on Wednesday, we
can review it of course.
Sami
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: meeting 2008-04-02 - versions and releases
2008-04-02 17:24 ` Sami Wagiaalla
@ 2008-04-04 14:47 ` Phil Muldoon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Phil Muldoon @ 2008-04-04 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sami Wagiaalla; +Cc: Andrew Cagney, frysk
Sami Wagiaalla wrote:
>
>> -> NEWS
>> - going into the Wednesday meeting; we should add news items, but
>> we'll use Wednesday to review it
>>
>
> News items should be considered on a per-commit basis; if your change
> is news worthy then add a thing to the news file. Then, on Wednesday,
> we can review it of course.
>
I don't really agree, NEWS should be feature based granularity. Per
commit would be a bit noisy. But I suspect regardless, we'll find a
happy level.
Regards
Phil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-04 9:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-04-02 15:29 meeting 2008-04-02 - versions and releases Andrew Cagney
2008-04-02 17:24 ` Sami Wagiaalla
2008-04-04 14:47 ` Phil Muldoon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).