From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19274 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2008 09:16:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 19266 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Apr 2008 09:16:58 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 09:16:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m349Gcul009128 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:16:38 -0400 Received: from pobox-2.corp.redhat.com (pobox-2.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m349GcJ6031234; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:16:38 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn-14-24.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.24]) by pobox-2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m349GbuC030711; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:16:37 -0400 Message-ID: <47F5F1F4.6070303@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:47:00 -0000 From: Phil Muldoon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sami Wagiaalla CC: Andrew Cagney , frysk Subject: Re: meeting 2008-04-02 - versions and releases References: <47F3A633.4000207@redhat.com> <47F3C141.6020404@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <47F3C141.6020404@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q2/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 Sami Wagiaalla wrote: > >> -> NEWS >> - going into the Wednesday meeting; we should add news items, but >> we'll use Wednesday to review it >> > > News items should be considered on a per-commit basis; if your change > is news worthy then add a thing to the news file. Then, on Wednesday, > we can review it of course. > I don't really agree, NEWS should be feature based granularity. Per commit would be a bit noisy. But I suspect regardless, we'll find a happy level. Regards Phil