From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31826 invoked by alias); 21 May 2008 15:09:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 31819 invoked by uid 22791); 21 May 2008 15:09:34 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 May 2008 15:09:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4LF9B1c001874 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 11:09:11 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m4LF99KI030799; Wed, 21 May 2008 11:09:09 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m4LF99VN023025; Wed, 21 May 2008 11:09:09 -0400 Message-ID: <48343B14.3060109@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 19:49:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Moore CC: frysk@sourceware.org Subject: Re: elfutils disassembler References: <20080515174029.336ec177@blackbox.bricoworks.com> In-Reply-To: <20080515174029.336ec177@blackbox.bricoworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q2/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 Cool. We gave it a spin at todays meeting and it looks good. For the SOLIB question, I think we can work with this for the moment, we'll be overhauling all the SOLIB stuff as part of JNI anyway. Andrew Tim Moore wrote: > I've reactivated the disassembler, using the elfutils version instead > of the one from libopcodes. Give it a spin. One problem with it is that > to run it in the build tree you need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to point to > the elfutils backend shared libraries e.g., > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=~/frysk-build/frysk-imports/elfutils/backends. Is there > a way to avoid that without much libtool madness? I haven't done > anything yet about installing those libraries when frysk is installed; > I'll look into that. > > Tim >