From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <frysk-return-2979-listarch-frysk=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22860 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2008 15:30:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 22680 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jul 2008 15:30:31 -0000
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:30:14 +0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) 	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6FFTdIe017125 	for <frysk@sourceware.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:29:39 -0400
Received: from pobox-3.corp.redhat.com (pobox-3.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.67]) 	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6FFTc1L010324; 	Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:29:38 -0400
Received: from toner.yyz.redhat.com (toner.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.16.55]) 	by pobox-3.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6FFTbi4027955; 	Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:29:38 -0400
Message-ID: <487CC261.5010806@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:30:00 -0000
From: Sami Wagiaalla <swagiaal@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rick Moseley <rmoseley@redhat.com>
CC: frysk <frysk@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: GDB interface: MI versus API or ??
References: <487B64C8.30707@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <487B64C8.30707@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <frysk.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:frysk-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:frysk@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:frysk-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-q3/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2


> "If you implement mi protocol it is less work on IDE side
...
> If Frysk was to use the MI protocol, I think its
> usage would be easier to implement for DSF.
...
> "MI is definitely the easiest way to integrate a debugger into CDT.
...

I think what they are saying is that MI is the easiest way to integrate 
into the CDT. They are not saying much (neither good nor bad) about MI 
as a technology.

Sami