From: Eric Bachalo <ebachalo@redhat.com>
To: Elena Zannoni <elena.zannoni@oracle.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, Frysk List <frysk@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: meeting
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:49:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <488C2E6C.10301@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4889CE2C.8040403@oracle.com>
Elena Zannoni wrote:
> Thanks for posting the minutes, I was out of town.
> I have a question, what is Redhat's position on the versions of frysk
> shipped with
> fedora and RHEL? They were tech previews, but are they going to be kept
> there?
> or obsoleted? Or?
Good questions. I don't have answers today, but answers to these
questions will be forthcoming,
- Eric
>
> elena
>
>
> Tom Tromey wrote:
>> Tom> I reset the bridge using a trick to try to work around its
>> Tom> timezone woes. I used this successfully once last week -- I hope
>> Tom> it works again tomorrow.
>>
>> It did, yay.
>>
>> Tom> My agenda items are:
>> [...]
>>
>> Some outcomes:
>>
>> * Thiago is happy with the decision. As far as we can tell he was the
>> only non-RH person on the call.
>>
>> * There is some confusion about our relationship to gdb. This is
>> understandable, IMO, since it is a bit vague. Basically I think the
>> best way to think about this project is that it is a development
>> branch with reasonably specific goals (see the earlier threads).
>>
>> * Speaking of the goals, an action item for everyone is to look at the
>> roadmap and see (1) if anything is missing, and (2) what you are
>> interested in working on.
>>
>> For #1, Sami asked about the state of non-stop multi-thread
>> debugging. There are patches on the list. Andrew asked about the
>> multi-process work, but we don't really know enough about it yet --
>> the discussion on the gdb list seems to be preliminary
>> investigation.
>>
>> * There was general consensus that we should not reuse the frysk list
>> for this work. So, we will set up a new list. Project name ideas
>> that I remember:
>>
>> gdb--
>>
>> Hmm, that is the only one I wrote down, but I know Phil had another
>> one.
>>
>> "--" seems a bit dismal to me, but "++" seems a bit arrogant :)
>> How about "Project Pelican"?
>>
>> Or anything else. Please.
>>
>> I'd like to settle this today, so... respond.
>>
>> * Where to host? Lots of hosting choices out there, but sourceware
>> seems like the default. We all have accounts, we have access, etc.
>> I'd like to get things set up ASAP, say today.
>>
>> * Talked about source control some. Jim Meyering is setting up a git
>> mirror of gdb CVS. We'll use this as our upstream and have our own
>> git repository.
>>
>> Andrew brought up gdb's eventual move to svn. We can revisit our
>> choices if/when that happens.
>>
>> * We talked about our planned process.
>>
>> The basic change is introducing universal patch review. The scratch
>> idea is:
>>
>> - All patches must be reviewed by someone other than the author.
>> - I forgot to mention this, but Apache-like, a strong objection
>> should stall a patch until a rough consensus is reached.
>> - Anybody "in the project" can review a patch. In fact, I think it
>> is pretty important that everybody do reviews.
>> - Proposed patch review guidelines:
>> * Does it have internal documentation (comments)?
>> * Does it follow upstream coding style?
>> * Does it have external documentation, if needed?
>> * Does it have a test case, if needed?
>> * Is it clear/complete/etc?
>>
>> Andrew asked about how we will decide to accept new contributors
>> into the fold. I think we'll solve this when it comes up.
>>
>> * Action items, for me:
>> - Set up hosting, mailing list
>> - Send consolidated roadmap to the new list
>> (Probably process stuff too)
>> - Send announcement to gdb list
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-27 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-22 21:21 meeting Tom Tromey
2008-07-23 20:04 ` meeting Tom Tromey
2008-07-23 20:39 ` meeting Tom Tromey
2008-07-23 21:10 ` meeting Phil Muldoon
2008-07-25 13:11 ` meeting Elena Zannoni
2008-07-25 16:32 ` meeting Tom Tromey
2008-07-23 22:12 ` meeting Tom Tromey
2008-07-24 18:45 ` meeting Tom Tromey
2008-07-25 13:06 ` meeting Elena Zannoni
2008-07-25 16:33 ` meeting Tom Tromey
2008-07-27 14:49 ` Eric Bachalo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=488C2E6C.10301@redhat.com \
--to=ebachalo@redhat.com \
--cc=elena.zannoni@oracle.com \
--cc=frysk@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).